Melbourne south east ยท VIC 3163
Buyers agent in Murrumbeena
Positive in every window on the chart, which nothing else at this price manages.
Figures below are August 2026, suburb level, all bedroom counts. Full Glen Eira council report.
The Murrumbeena numbers
Houses
$1,793,726
Typical price
$854
Weekly rent
2.48%
Gross yield
+2.8%
Growth a year, 10yr
+1.9%
Growth, last 12mth
74
Sales a year
Units
$675,858
Typical price
$598
Weekly rent
4.60%
Gross yield
+1.5%
Growth a year, 10yr
-0.9%
Growth, last 12mth
201
Sales a year
Vacancy rate 1.87% across roughly 5,141 dwellings. HtAG Analytics, suburb level, all bedroom counts. Typical price is a modelled estimate, not a median of recent sales.
The honest read
What I'd tell you over a coffee
Murrumbeena has grown 2.84% a year over ten years, 1.05% over five, 1.38% over three, and 1.90% in the last twelve months.
Every one of those is positive. On this list, at this price point, that is genuinely unusual. Caulfield next door is negative over five years. Malvern East is negative over three, five and ten.
None of the numbers are exciting. They are just consistently the right side of zero, and across a decade of holding costs that is worth something.
A typical house is $1,793,726 on a 2.48% yield. About $854 a week. That is the weak part.
The market is thin. 74 house sales a year across about 5,141 dwellings, so when something decent comes up there is competition for it.
Rent has grown 4.89% a year over the decade and vacancy is 1.87%. Units are $675,858 with growth of 1.45% a year, so the house is the better half of this suburb.
Who Murrumbeena suits
Owner occupiers who want Glen Eira schools and a station without paying Caulfield or Malvern money, and are happy with steady rather than spectacular.
What I'd watch
The turnover. 74 sales a year is very few, which means the typical price moves on a small sample and you may wait a while for the right property.
How I work
- Flat $20,000 fee, whatever you buy and wherever it is
- No commissions from agents, developers or builders
- I'll tell you when a suburb doesn't stack up, including this one
Fair questions
Buying in Murrumbeena, answered
Murrumbeena or Caulfield?
Murrumbeena, on the last decade. 2.84% a year against 0.63%, and it is cheaper at $1,793,726 against $1,835,747. Caulfield has been negative over five years and Murrumbeena has not.
Is 2.84% a year good?
It is roughly inflation. Which is not a great investment, and is a great deal better than the several suburbs on this list that went backwards. Whether it is good enough depends on what else you were considering.
What does the thin turnover mean for me?
Two things. You will wait longer for the right house, and the published typical price is built on a small sample so treat it as a guide. It is also why having someone watching the market properly matters more here than in a suburb with a thousand sales a year.
Other Melbourne suburbs
Same treatment, same data, different answer in every one of them.
- Truganina
- Craigieburn
- Blairgowrie
- Langwarrin
- Hallam
- Coburg
- Glenroy
- Moonee Ponds
- Altona
- Yarraville
- Brighton East
- Beaumaris
- Brunswick
- Blackburn
- Doncaster
- Highett
- Black Rock
- Seddon
- Balwyn
- Port Melbourne
- Ringwood
- Ripponlea
- Sandringham
- Fitzroy
- Caulfield
- St Kilda
- Malvern
- East Melbourne
- Brighton
- Hawthorn East
- Balaclava
- Hawthorn
- Malvern East
- Box Hill
- South Yarra